header_main_sponsor_logo
header_main_sponsor_logo
P1-UT-Layton-05_shows surcharge and girders at temp location.jpg
P2-UT-Layton-16_Span 1 Launch 001 (1).jpg
P3-UT-Layton-21_Bridge open to traffic.jpg
PA1-UT-Layton-02_temp structure constn.jpg
PA2-UT-Layton-08_surhcarge removed.jpg
PA3-UT-Layton-09_abutcap and temp concrete slab constructed.jpg
PA4-UT-Layton-10_bridge on Ikki wood and jack towers removal of temp str.jpg
PA5-UT-Layton-13_tracks in place bridge half way lowered_2.jpg
PA6-UT-Layton-15_inverted slide shoe bridge nose during launch.jpg
PA7-UT-Layton-17_Span 1 Launch 013.jpg
PA8-UT-Layton-18_span 1 launch.jpg
P1-UT-Layton-05_shows surcharge and girders at temp location.jpg
P2-UT-Layton-16_Span 1 Launch 001 (1).jpg
P3-UT-Layton-21_Bridge open to traffic.jpg
PA1-UT-Layton-02_temp structure constn.jpg
PA2-UT-Layton-08_surhcarge removed.jpg
PA3-UT-Layton-09_abutcap and temp concrete slab constructed.jpg
PA4-UT-Layton-10_bridge on Ikki wood and jack towers removal of temp str.jpg
PA5-UT-Layton-13_tracks in place bridge half way lowered_2.jpg
PA6-UT-Layton-15_inverted slide shoe bridge nose during launch.jpg
PA7-UT-Layton-17_Span 1 Launch 013.jpg
PA8-UT-Layton-18_span 1 launch.jpg

2010 - I-15 / Layton Parkway Bridge

  • Year ABC Built: 2010
  • State: Utah
  • Owner: State
  • Location: Urban
  • Spans: Two-span
  • Beam Material: Steel
  • Max Span Length (ft.): 108.80
  • Total Bridge Length (ft.): 217.80
  • Construction Equipment: Longitudinal Launching
  • State ID #: S-15-8(211)332
  • NBI #: 1C1006
  • Coordinates:     Latitude: 41.0561104, Longitude: -111.9608307
  • Bridge Description

  • Project Summary:
  • Project Location: Over I-15 in the city of Layton in Davis County, north of Salt Lake City
  • Mobility Impact Time: ABC: Overnight closure of I-15 for each span launch ; Conventional: 6 to 12 months of I-15 traffic impacts
  • Impact Category: Tier 1 (within 1 day)
  • Primary Drivers:

    reduced onsite construction time; reduced traffic impacts; improved work-zone safety; improved site constructability; improved material quality and product durability

  • Dimensions: 217.8-ft long and 134.3-ft wide two-span steel girder bridge longitudinal launch; 1,050-ton 108.8-ft-long span self-weight, 1,050-ton 106.0-ft-long span self-weight
  • Average Daily Traffic (at time of construction): 92900
  • Traffic Management: Traffic management alternative, if constructed conventionally: On I-15, provide traffic detours from northbound to southbound and southbound to northbound for all lanes during bridge superstructure construction. This would mean providing two lanes of traffic for both northbound and southbound during most of the superstructure construction, with further reduction in traffic lanes during critical components of bridge construction.
  • Existing Bridge Description:
  • Replacement or New Bridge: This new bridge was part of the South Layton Interchange Project that replaced a half interchange and flyover with a Single Point Urban Interchange. The project also included replacing an at-grade railroad crossing with a single-span bridge on Layton Parkway a short distance from this bridge. This bridge has two 12-ft-wide traffic lanes and a 15-ft-wide turn lane in each direction, an 8-ft-wide sidewalk and 17-ft-wide shoulder on one side, and a 9-ft-wide bike lane and 13.75-ft-wide shoulder on the other side. The cross-section consists of 12 steel plate girders at 11.67-ft spacing and six flared girders per span, with 9-inch-thick cast-in-place lightweight concrete deck.
  • Construction Method: The ends of the bridge were supported on integral abutments with wrap around 2-stage MSE walls on footings supported by driven piles. The interior support was constructed conventionally. The vertical profile of the bridge was raised 29 ft to lift Layton Parkway over the railroad tracks at the new single-span bridge a short distance away. Poor soil conditions at the project site required that 13 ft of surcharge be placed to expedite settlement of new embankments.The contract required the contractor to limit construction impacts to the traveling public on I-15. To minimize construction activities over I-15, each superstructure span was constructed behind the permanent abutments. The temporary supports for the spans were built high because of the 29-ft-high surcharge placed behind the abutments. Once settlement had occurred and the surcharge was removed, each span was lowered to finished grade using self-climbing jacks. The span was lowered onto a skid beam at the rear end and sliding pads placed on top of slide shoe at forward end.For the first span launch, the southbound lanes of I-15 were closed in several steps beginning at 7 pm on a Saturday in August, with complete closure of all southbound lanes reached by 11 pm. The west span was then longitudinally launched / slid over I-15 to its final location using large hydraulic rams. The lanes were opened again at 4 am Sunday.Two weeks later, the northbound lanes of I-15 were closed in several steps beginning at 8 pm on Saturday, with complete closure of all northbound lanes reached by midnight. The east span was then longitudinally launched / slid over I-15 to its final location using large hydraulic rams. The lanes were opened again at 6 am Sunday.A closure joint over the interior support was placed to tie the two spans together and make the superstructure continuous for live load.A half-inch-thick polymer overlay was placed to provide a skid resistant long lasting wearing surface and protective system for the bridge deck.A travel lane interruption disincentive was established to ensure timely construction. Notice to proceed was given in August 2009, and substantial completion was in November 2010.
  • Stakeholder Feedback:

    The ABC method was perceived by owner, designer, and contractor as successful and most likely would be considered for future projects.

  • High Performance Material: Lightweight concrete deck
  • Project Planning

  • Decision Making Tools: State process
  • Site Procurement: (none)
  • Project Delivery: Design-build
  • Contracting: Incentive / disincentive clauses
  • Geotechnical Solutions

  • Foundations & Walls: (none)
  • Rapid Embankment: Embankment surcharge
  • Structural Solutions

  • Prefabricated Bridge Elements: MSE walls
  • Prefabricated Bridge Systems: FDcBs (full-width concrete-decked steel beam unit)
  • Miscellaneous Prefabricated: CIP reinforced concrete closure joints; Thin-bonded epoxy overlay; LWC deck
  • ABC Construction Equipment: Longitudinal launch w/pad (skids)
  • Cost & Funding

  • Costs: $ 9.3 million construction cost. The contractor priced the risk and staff hours into the bid for accelerated construction. The estimated cost of accelerated techniques was approximately $1.3 million.
  • Funding Source: State Only
  • Incentive Program: (none)
  • Additional Information

Downloadable Resources

Contract Plans:
Construction Schedule:
Other Related Information:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ezy0Gk5QT0
http://www.udot.utah.gov

Photo Credits: Utah Department of Transportation

 

Contacts

Owner: Carmen Swanwick, P.E.
Chief Structural Engineer
Utah Department of Transportation
cswanwick@utah.gov
801-965-4981

Bridge Description Summary Sheet: